Updated: Case Moves Forward as Judge Drops Ex Parte, Members of “New California” Sue California’s SOS and Sacramento Registrar

to Prevent Them from Retroactively Purchasing Non-Tested or Certified Voting Machines

AENN

Update

Sacramento Superior Court Judge Sueyoshi denied the Ex Parte Application for a TRO and for Preliminary Injunction for the following reasons:

Plaintiffs ex parte application is DENIED.

Plaintiffs ex parte application suffers from both procedural and substantive defects requiring denial. Plaintiffs application fails to comply with California Rules of Court (CRC) 3.1200, et seq. Critically, Plaintiff supplies no
declaration of notice as required by CRC 3.1201(3) and 3.1204. This failure requires denial ofthis application. That two of the Defendants filed oppositions does not negate Plaintiffs failure to submit a proper and complete ex parte application in the first instance. Further, Plaintiff provides no memorandum of points and authorities as required by CRC 3.1201(4). Additionally, the multiple and duplicative one-page proposed orders do not satisfy the minimum specificity requirements of a proposed temporary restraining order and order to show cause re: preliminary injunction, and thus, do not satisfy CRC 3.1201(5). Nor did Plaintiff file proofs of service for this 1 CASE NUMBER: 34-2022-00328797 CASE TITLE: Bish vs. Weber DEPARTMENT: 53PROCEEDINGS: Ruling on Ex Parte Application for TRO and for Preliminary Injunction application or establish exceptional circumstances pursuant to CRC 3.1206. These additional defects also require denial.

Read the ruling HERE:

Even thought the Judge ruled to deny the Ex Parte the case moves forward allowing the plaintiffs discovery with hearings set for July 2023.

By Joe Hoft
Published October 26, 2022 at 2:00pm Updated October 28, 2022 3:00 pm pst

Members of New California are suing the California Secretary of State and the Registrar-Clerk of Sacramento County for attempting to retroactively purchase voting machines that are neither tested nor certified according to state law. 

Members in the effort to create the new state of New California are suing the California Secretary of State and Sacramento County’s Registrar-Clerk to prevent the retroactive purchase of voting machines that have not been properly tested or certified according to state law.

As Gateway Pundit Reported: Democrat PACs Are Already Tracking 2022 Midterm Votes Cast, By Party, By Age, By County, and Gender –Why Is This Allowed?

We’ve been reporting on the state of “New California”.  This effort is being led by citizens in the state of California who believe the state is acting unconstitutionally and they can no longer be a part of that state.  These individuals are using the West Virginia model used during the Civil War to create their new state – the state of New California.

Paul Preston from the state of New California and others are suing the California Secretary of State, Shirley Weber and local Sacramento County Registrars to prevent them from purchasing voting machines that are not tested and not certified according to California state law.

The county is trying to retroactively purchase voting machines in the county that are neither tested or certified.  These machines were used in the June election and the county is attempting to use them again in two weeks in the November election.

The machines have not been tested or certified but they were already used and the state of California and Sacramento County is planning on using them again and voting on this in an upcoming meeting.

See the court filing below.

SKMBT_C22022102511270 by Jim Hoft on Scribd

READ PDF

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: